Tuesday 11 October 2011

Edith Swan-neck

 Shortly after The Battle of Hastings Eadgifu Swanneshals, known as Edith Swan-neck was brought to the field at Senlac by two priests of Waltham Abbey, Osgod Cnoppe and Elthelric Childemaister, to identify King Harold’s body.  Amongst the slain, she discovered his corpse, almost unrecognisable, stripped of all regal insignia. The Waltham Chronicler writes:
‘She had at one time been the king’s concubine and knew the secret marks on his body better than others did, for she had been admitted to a greater intimacy of his person. Thus they would be assured by her knowledge of his secret marks when they could not be sure from his external appearance.’

 Waltham Chronicle 12th Century
What do we know about Edith Swan-neck? Women are marginalised in early historical accounts so Edith presents a challenge for any twenty first century writer.  
Heiress
Edith is recorded in the Domesday Book as Edfgifu the Rich, an heiress who brought extensive lands to Harold’s support when he was created Earl of Anglia in 1042. She was an Anglo-Danish noblewoman.
‘Count Alain holds Cherry Hinton…There is land for 13 ploughs…19 villans, 22 borders, with 9 ploughs…Eadgifu the Fair held this manor…’  The Domesday Book also records that she held other manors in Hertfordshire, Berks, Essex and Cambridgeshire and dwellings in Canterbury. She was a woman of some substance.

 Wife or Concubine
Edith and Harold were married More Danico. This was a system whereby the bride and groom were hand-fasted which perhaps nowadays might be compared to a civil partnership. Historian, Frank Barlow suggests that they were cousins in the fifth degree, indicating that a Church wedding was unacceptable. However, the arrangement allowed Harold to later remarry within the Church. In 1066, he made a politically expedient marriage to Aldgyth, sister of the Northern Earls.  Although Edith had now become his “concubine” he was, I suggest, still deeply attached to her and their six surviving children, Godwin, Edmund, Magnus, Gytha, Gunnhild and Ulf. The importance of these children is indicated by the fact that one of them was held hostage in the aftermath of the battle.  

A Noble Lady
The swanlike white skin of her neck was a sign of beauty amongst English noble women. She would have been greatly admired. As a wealthy aristocrat, she had her personal goldsmith, Grimwald. As a noble woman she probably received a basic education. We know that she donated a valuable Gospel to Thorney Abbey. Moreover, she was the benefactress of St Benet’s Monastery.
  After the Great Battle
Bayeaux Tapestry Historian, Andrew Bridgeford suggests that she fled when the Normans burned Godwin property in Sussex. He posits that this estate is The Burning House depicted on The Bayeux Tapestry. After the Battle, Edith disappears from historical record. By 1086, her lands had passed to an invader, Alain of Richmond. Possibly she joined Harold’s mother Gytha in Exeter from where she may have been exiled after the siege in the winter of 1068; perhaps she joined her exiled sons in Ireland or Denmark. Equally, she may have lived out her life in a Nunnery. Whatever happened after she identified King Harold’s corpse, I like to think that she survived the terrible aftermath of 1066. As Harold ’s lover and mother of his six children she has a place in the epic story of 1066 and therefore should be remembered.


This blog is part of a sequence in commemoration of the Battle of Hastings and there is a competition being run by the Historical Novels Society on this link.  There are questions on the six blogs and the chance to win £50 worth of Amazon vouchers.

18 comments:

  1. Is there a problem with commenting?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe that Edyth (Eadgifu / Edith - there are varying spellings) went to Kiev with her daughter who married into the Rus royal line. (not sure if it was her husband Vladimir or son who became the first Tsar?) We do know their son was named Harold - most unusual to name a son after the maternal grandfather!
    It makes logical sense for Edyth to have gone to Kiev. Would she really have allowed her daughter to go all that way alone? (although possibly one or two brothers also accompanied her) This would also explain why we hear no more or her.
    One of the reasons why I wrote Harold the King (US I am the Chosen King) is because I wanted to explore more about Edyth. What a remarkable woman she must have been!
    Out of interest: those who follow Elizabeth Chadwick's blogs about the Akashic Records.... her description of Edyth was very similar to what I "saw" One day I will write it all up fully - buit for now, I know it sounds doubtful, but I dreamt the entire scene that became chapter 2 of my novel - every detail, even the dialogue. I clearly saw Edyth as a young girl beside the river Lea.
    I think she agreed to identify Harold's body because she assumed Duke William was going to permit him a Christian grave.
    But the question remains.... did she identify the right body, or did she deliberately identify the wrong one, knowing William was a double-crossing B*****d?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Superbly well researched and fascinating insight into the intriguing and enigmatic Edith 'Swan-neck'. Thank you, Carol - I'd like to know more!...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Jenny for your comment. I am glad you found her interesting and hopefully my edits on the novel will bring it to light and more on Edith too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you Helen for commenting and I love the theory.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I found this really interesting, Carol. Thank you for it.

    Liz X

    ReplyDelete
  7. And many thanks for reading it and leaving a comment, Liz. It worked at last.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is an utterly fascinating bit of history. The story of Edith is very appealing and your reseach has brought her to life. That's the magic of history.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Indeed Leisel, and she is utter fun to place in a story. However with so little real information much has to be imagined!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is it known which of the children was held hostage after the battle? What is the source of this information?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes Ulf was held hostage. Source is John of Worcester who wrote that Robert of Normandy was unconcerned about the risk involved in rteleasing political prisoners. He freed both Ulf Haroldson and Duncan, son of Malcom of the Scotts, knighted them and allowed them to leave. Ulf was more fortunate than his uncle Wulfnoth in that he fell into the custody of the Conqueror's eldest son. He was released after King William's death. Hostage taking was very common of course! So, Chronicle of john of Worcester.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ulf was knighted and he acquired skill in cavalry. This would have enabled him to find employment with a Norman magnate. He retained his name but as a knight in Normandy he became known as Loup Fitz Heraut, Wolf , son of Harold. He may be identified in attestations to late 11thC charters.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ulf is mentioned by John of Worcester as a hostage in Normandy at the time of William's death in 1087 but what evidence is there that Ulf was taken hostage in the aftermath of the battle? Ian W Walker mentions this only as a possibility in 'Harold the Last Anglo-Saxon King'. Frank Barlow in 'The Godwins' states that John of Worcester's mention of Ulf in 1087 is the first time his name is recorded. Presumably his attestations to the late 11th C charters were in Normandy. Very interesting that you've found him there under his French name.

    ReplyDelete
  14. There isn't any proof and as you must know even primary sources muddle things up and have agendas which murky the waters. I don't accept Poitiers, Carmen, Tapestry for instance as necessarily totally truthful accounts esp. Carmen. They are accounts. So Ulf, well, the answer is there isn't one. In my novel The Handfasted Wife I take a line but I absolutely mix fiction and recorded information. I can't do otherwise with what there is.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sorry for my english.
    I am interested in this story.Sometimes i think may be she was pushed by William to find the body of Harold.We forget one aspect of this story-for coronation they needed the coron.I imagin Harold took the coron with him to battle and it was lost.As we remember Edgar Etheling after was proclaimed a king and i broke my head trying to understend why he was not coronated.It is just theory nothing els ;after ,we don't know was the coron found of not.If it was found Edit could take it wiht her to Kiev of hide in England,of........

    ReplyDelete
  16. How kind of you to comment. I love your idea about King Harold's crown. Her daughter married the prince of Kiev. I think Edith Swan-neck did eventually enter a convent. If only you could read my novel The Handfasted Wife. I think you may be Russian? It is only published in English so far. My third book will be about medieval Kiev.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Thank you very much for answer.It is crown not "coron".And i am Russian.But history of England was always my grand passion;medieval history to be exact.It is like I have seen it with my own eyes.
    I will surely read your novel even in English.About your third book -in wich period are you interestsd in?I think about Yaroslav Le Grand.He had four daughters-one Anna was Qween of France another Qween of Norway ;Agatha was marryed wis Edward the Exile;the fourth Qween of Hungary.Because of family Godvinson two sisters lost their husbands.We can imagin that Anna could help William with one condition not make any harm to Edgar Etheling.Anyway i don't understand why William never punished him and let him alive.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Third book is about Gytha eldest daughter of Harold II of England and Edith Swan-Neck who married the prince of Kiev, Novgorad as it was. Look on amazon books uk for The Handfasted Wife. My first degree was Russian Literature, Russian Studies. You could find me @carolmcgrath on Twitter. Follow. I shall follow back. My third book will be called The Princess of Kiev.

    ReplyDelete